SA 56. AN INTRODUCTION TO CRAZY TAXATION – by Tommas Graves
EMPLOYERS’ BURDEN, INTRODUCTION
Tommasic dialogue
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
This looks like a nice country
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Yes, we do some things very well.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Only some?
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Well our tax system is a disaster
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Oh dear! What is the tax rate on wages for example?
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
One hundred percent!
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
What! But I have a leaflet here from HMRC. It does not mention anything like that!
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
No, it is heavily disguised.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Tell me more.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Right. But first we had better be clear what we are talking about.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Go ahead!
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Well, here is a tin of beans, it costs one pound before tax.They then add 20% VAT. So the tax rate is expressed as a percentage of the cost before tax.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Seems straightforward. What are you leading to?
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
When I say our tax rate on wages is 100%, I mean the taxes are 100% of what is left after tax is deducted.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
OK, I get that. But how does it tie up with this leaflet?
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
We start with the cost to the employer, then take off all the taxes paid on that cost, until we get left with what the worker actually enjoys. We find that all the taxes are as much as what he actually enjoys. So that is a tax rate of 100%.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
So you mean that 50% of Employers’ costs of wages goes in taxation?
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Yes, but from the point of view of the wage earner, as in the tin of beans, the rate on what is left for him to live on is 100%.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Right, I get it. But why do they do it that way?
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
That is a tricky question. What it comes down to, is that the people of this country prefer this system, rather than using the natural provision for government expenditure, which is expressed as location alues, created by all for the use of all.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
How odd! But I suppose if I’m going to live here, I had better understand the details.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Here is a set of tables…………………………..
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
The numbers at the foot are the total salaries negotiated when you take on a job. The employer has to pay more than that because he has to pay a surcharge called National Insurance of 13.8%. The mauve columns show the rate of tax applied to the remainder that the worker actually enjoys, after Income Tax, more National Insurance, and Indirect Taxes included in his purchases.
The yellow columns are the result of the same calculations for Self-Employed persons, who pay lower rates of National Insurance. However, remember they are responsible for their own Pension contributions.
The Indirect taxes included are derived from Government Statistics which show that the lower paid pay a higher proportion of their take home pay than do the higher paid, thus reversing some of the effects of lower Income tax rates.
The tax rates and detailed calculations are on the attached sheets.
Another way of looking at it follows;-
What this chart shows is the constituent parts of the cost of wages to an employer. For any given gross pay shown on the left, 100% is the employers’ cost including Employers National Insurance contributions in purple. Indirect taxes are shown in green, direct taxes, PAYE and Employees NIC in orange. The blue part is what is left to the employee to spend, excluding VAT and other indirect taxes, which we have called “reward for work”, ie take-home-pay less indirect taxes.
A particular aspect that is mostly forgotten is that Indirect Taxes impact more heavily on the poor. The Office for National Statistics publish an occasional table which shows that the lowest quintile of earners pay 31% of take-home-pay in indirect taxes, while the top quintile only pay 13%. As the chart shows, this partly counteracts the lower Income Tax and NIC suffered by the lower paid group.
The overall effect is to show that of the total cost to the employer, at least half is taken in tax. Or, perhaps, the cost of wages is double the actual reward for work enjoyed by the employees.
If the Chancellor was to promote a policy of doubling the cost of wages by the imposition of taxes, he would presumably expect certain thing to happen as a result!
Here are some suggestions as to the possible effects of this policy:
1. A sharp distinction of the view of wages from the points of view of employees and employers.
2. A bias against labour intensive industries.
3. A constant impulse to replace people by machines.
4. Unemployment as a constant factor in the economy.
5. The effect of taxation at the margin, leading to more tax required to mitigate the effects.
6. In the cycle of production, employment based taxation rolls up until paid by the final consumer. His gross pay has to be sufficient to pay the taxes and leave him enough to live on.
7. Government expenditure is mostly wages, and is thus doubled under the same rules.
8. In order to cover the cost, an employee has to be able to add value to an amount twice what he needs to live on. Those who cannot meet this criteria will find their jobs at risk.
Is it any surprise to find that these things have actually happened?
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Well, it seems a funny way to do things. But I read that you give some of the taxes back?
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Yes we do. They are called tax credits. And the rules for getting back some of the tax you have paid are even more complicated than the rules for paying it in the first place. Low paid people get more back than they have paid!
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
That must have some odd effects?
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Yes, indeed. Here is a chart of average wages;- so, we know that average wages came down, and rents increased, when tax credits were brought in. The total tax credits became a huge drain on the Treasury, but did not affect our charts very much.
We can still say the tax on wages is 100%!
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
ave-wages[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
And here is a chart showing how tax credits impact on lower incomes. (Produced by “Mothers at Home Matter) The thin red line is the original Gross Income then the blue area is the income after Income Tax Indirect taxes would reduce the blue area still further.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Well, perhaps in spite of all that, I’ll still come to live here, Can I get a house easily?
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Oh yes! You can get a house built for £60,000 upwards, and an old house can be very cheap.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Really! That’s great.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
But there is a snag. You remember those location values I was talking about?
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Yes.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Well, because they were not collected for public use, they became site values. So a decent site near to London, for example, might cost you upwards of one million pounds.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Oh dear! Maybe I’ll go and live somewhere else.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Resident
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Again there is a snag. At one time, this country had a huge empire, and we exported both our good practices and the failure to collect location value for public purposes to all the empire, and these countries still do that. So your choice is rather limited.
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
[GDC_row][GDC_column size=”quarter”]
Stranger
[/GDC_column][GDC_column size=”three-quarters”]
Well, thank you. I think I’ll say goodbye now!
[/GDC_column][/GDC_row]
***********************
Articles
Land Value Tax Links
The Tax Burden
Article List
- Welcome
- SA 88. Is there another way? by Tommas Graves
- SA 87. Time for a look at Rent by Tommas Graves
- SA 86. It’s rather Odd………….. By Tommas Graves
- SA85. Born to become a Georgist by Ole Lefmann
- SA84. Happy Nation by Lasse Anderson
- SA83. Ulm is buying up land, sent by Dirk Lohr
- SA82. Radical Tax Reform by Duncan Pickard
- SA 81. All taxes come out of Rents, by Rumplestatskin.
- SA 80. The Housing Crisis and the Common Good, by Joseph Milne
- SA 79. The “housing crisis” is no such thing, by Mark Wadsworth
- SA78. The Inquisitive Boy by “Spokeshave”
- SA 75. A Note on Swedish Taxes, by Tony Vickers MScIS MRICS
- SA 74. Homes Vic by Emily Sims
- SA73 Public Revenue Without Taxation by Peter Bowman
- SA71. Two presentations by Ed Dodson
- Short Sighted Benevolence
- SA 72. CAN YOU SEE THE CAT?
- SA70. Dissertation on Land Rental by Marion Ray
- Verses on the theme
- SA69. Argentina by Fernando Scornic Gerstein
- SA68. The Right to Work, by Leslie Blake
- SA66. The Most Wonderful Manuscript by Ivy Akeroyd 1932
- SA65. Housing Crisis? What Housing Crisis? by Mark Wadsworth
- SA64. Making Use of History by Roy Douglas
- SA63. The Fairhope Single Tax Colony – from their website
- TP35. What to do about “The just about managing” by Tommas Graves
- SA62. A Huge Extra Resource, by Ed Dodson
- SA61. Foundations of Earth Sharing Why It Matters: By Lawrence Bosek
- SA60. How to Restore Economic Growth, by Fred Foldvary, Ph.D.
- Two cartoons by Andrew MacLaren MP
- SA59. The Meaning of Work, by Joseph Milne
- SA 58. THE FUNCTION OF ECONOMICS, by Leon Maclaren
- SA 57. CONFUSIONS CONCERNING MONEY AND LAND by Shirley-Anne Hardy
- SA 56. AN INTRODUCTION TO CRAZY TAXATION – by Tommas Graves
- SA 55. LAND REFORM IN TAIWAN by Chen Cheng (preface) 1961
- SA54. Saving the Commons in an age of Plunder – by Bill Batt
- SA53.- Eurofail – VAT, by Henry Law
- SA52. Low Hanging Fruit – by Henry Law
- SA51. Location Theory and the European Union, – by Peter Holland
- SA50. Finland’s Basic Income – why it matters by Fred Foldvary, Ph.D.
- SA 29. A New Model of the Economy, by Brian Hodgkinson, as reviewed by Martin Adams of Progress.org
- Economics Explained (In 1 Simple Cartoon)
- SA 48. LANDED (Freeman’s Wood) by John Angus-StoreyG2
- SA 47. Justice and the Common Good by Joseph Milne
- SA 49.Prosper Australia – Vacancies Report
- SA39. A lesson from Alaska: further thoughts? By Alanna Hartzog
- SA23. Taxation: a brief history by Roy Douglas
- SA45. Of course, it wouldn’t solve all problems………by Tommas Graves
- SA43. TIME TO CALL THE LANDOWNERS’ BLUFF by Duncan Pickard
- SA44. Answering questions to UN Habitat 3 Financing Urban Development by Alanna Hartzog
- SA15. Why we don’t have a Housing Shortage, by Ben Weenen
- SA27. Money and Natural Law, By Tommas Graves
- SA42. NO DEBT, HIGH GROWTH, LOW TAX By Andrew Purves
- SA40. High Land Prices and Rural Unemployment, by Duncan Pickard
- SA28. Economics is a Natural Science by Duncan Pickard
- SA34. Economic Answers to Ecological Problems by Seymour Rauch
- SA22. Public Revenue without Taxation by David Triggs
- SA41. WHAT FAMOUS PEOPLE SAID ABOUT LAND contributed by Frank de Jong
- SA36. TAX THE RICH? Pikety and all that……..by Tommas Graves
- SA46. LAND VALUE TAX: A VIABLE ALTERNATIVE By Henry Law
- SA35. HOW CAN THE ECONOMY WORK FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL? By Peter Bowman, lecture given at the School of Economic Science.
- SA38. WHO CARES ABOUT THE FAMILY by Ann Fennell.
- SA30. The Turning Tide: The Beginning of Monetary Trade in Anglo-Saxon England by Raymond Makewell
- SA31. FAULTS IN THE UK TAX SYSTEM
- SA33. HISTORY OF PUBLIC REVENUE WITHOUT TAXATION by John de Val
- SA32. Denmark By Ole Lefman
- SA25. Anglo-Saxon Land Tenure by Raymond Makewell
- SA21. China – Four Thousand Years of Taxing the Land by Peter Bowman
- SA26. The Economic Philosophy of Georgism, by Emma Crosby